General
Henry Bohlen, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants
133 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Bohlen, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants.
(Submitted May 25, 1892;
decided June 14, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of" New York, entered upon an order made the first Monday of April, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Julien T. Davies and Brama/rd Tolies for appellants.
Charles Gibson Bennett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse and grant new trial on decisions in Roberts v. Met. E. R. Co. (118 N. Y. 455); Doyle v. Same (Id. 488), and Gray v. Same (Id. 499); no opinion.
Ail concur, except Gray, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.