Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lupino v. Young, Warden, 1969 — 396 U.S. 872 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Lupino v. Young, Warden
396 U.S. 872·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1574,
Misc., October Term, 1968.
Lupino v. Young, Warden,
Lynn S. Castner and John S. Connolly on the motion in support of the petition for rehearing.
[MAJORITY]
394 U. S. 969. Motion of Minnesota Civil Liberties Union for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for rehearing denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.