Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mark Craig, Plaintiff in Error, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 1916 — 241 U.S. 692 · caselaw · US
General
Mark Craig, Plaintiff in Error, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
241 U.S. 692·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 272.
Mark Craig, Plaintiff in Error, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky.
In error to the Hardin County Quarterly Court, the State of Kentucky.
Argued for defendant in error May 3, 1916.
Decided May 3, 1916.
Mr. Hobson L. James for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Arthur H. Mann for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment reversed with costs and cause remanded for further proceedings upon confession of error by the defendant in error and motion of Mr. Arthur H. Mann for the defendant in error.