Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis TABATCHNICK, Joseph Tabatchnick, and Jack Tabatchnick, Individually and Trading as Tabatchnick & Sons, Bankrupts, Appellants, v. Abraham GOLDEN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Louis Tabatchnick, Joseph Tabatchnick, and Jack Tabatchnick, Individually and Trading as Tabatchnick & Sons, Bankrupts, and William Hogg, Inc., a Creditor, Appellees, 1934 — 71 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Louis TABATCHNICK, Joseph Tabatchnick, and Jack Tabatchnick, Individually and Trading as Tabatchnick & Sons, Bankrupts, Appellants, v. Abraham GOLDEN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Louis Tabatchnick, Joseph Tabatchnick, and Jack Tabatchnick, Individually and Trading as Tabatchnick & Sons, Bankrupts, and William Hogg, Inc., a Creditor, Appellees
71 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis TABATCHNICK, Joseph Tabatchnick, and Jack Tabatchnick, Individually and Trading as Tabatchnick & Sons, Bankrupts, Appellants, v. Abraham GOLDEN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Louis Tabatchnick, Joseph Tabatchnick, and Jack Tabatchnick, Individually and Trading as Tabatchnick & Sons, Bankrupts, and William Hogg, Inc., a Creditor, Appellees.
No. 5231.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 27, 1934.
Herman B. J. Weekstoin, of Newark, N. J., for appellants.
Raymond H. Berry, of Newark, N. J., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decree of the court below denying the petition of the bankrupts to be discharged. In making the order, no opinion was filed, but, after a thorough examination of the record by the individual members of this court, we are of opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.
Without discussing the matter in detail, we axe satisfied the credit statement given by the bankrupts evidenced their assets at that time and they have not satisfactorily accounted for the diminution of those assets. We are also satisfied that the improbable story of the disappearance of such books as the bankrupts kept is not worthy of belief.
All of the matters advanced by the bankrupts’ counsel have been duly considered, with the result that the decree below is approved and affirmed.