Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, 1938 — 305 U.S. 666 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach
305 U.S. 666·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10.
United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach.
November 7, 1938.
Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Messrs. Gordon Dean, Mahlon D. Kiefer, and W. Marvin Smith for the United States.
Messrs. Duane R. Dills and Eugene E. Heaton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for rehearing granted. The judgment of affirmance entered October 17, 1938, ante, p. 564, is vacated and the case is restored to the docket for reargument.