Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ackerley Communications, Inc., et al. v. City of Seattle et al.; and Diamond Parking, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 1980 — 449 U.S. 804 · caselaw · US
General
Ackerley Communications, Inc., et al. v. City of Seattle et al.; and Diamond Parking, Inc. v. City of Seattle
449 U.S. 804·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 79-1969.
No. 79-1972.
Ackerley Communications, Inc., et al. v. City of Seattle et al.; and Diamond Parking, Inc. v. City of Seattle.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from Sup. Ct. Wash, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari denied. Reported below: 92 Wash. 2d 905, 602 P. 2d 1177.