General
Charles E. Moses, Respondent, v. Albert H. Hatch et al., Individually, and as Executors of William Moses, Deceased, Appellants, Impleaded with Others
159 N.Y. 565·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. Moses, Respondent, v. Albert H. Hatch et al., Individually, and as Executors of William Moses, Deceased, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Reported below, 21 App. Div. 468.
(Submitted June 5, 1899;
decided June 13, 1899.)
Motion to prefer an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 15, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on a trial without a jury.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the only real defendants are the executors, appellants, and that the pendency of the appeal delays the settlement of an estate.
Nathaniel Niles for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.