Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Schwede v. Zenith Steamship Co., 1917 — 244 U.S. 646 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George Schwede v. Zenith Steamship Co.
244 U.S. 64661 L. Ed. 1369·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
(Mr. Justice Day took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.)
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 372.
George Schwede v. Zenith Steamship Co.
On certificate from and writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Argued October 17, 18, 1916.
Reargued January 10, 11, 1917.
Decided May 21, 1917.
Mr. R. B. New-comb and Mr. Frank M. Cobb for Schwede.
Mr. Luther Day for Zenith Steamship Company.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment of the District Court of the United States for the .Northern District of Ohio affirmed with costs by an equally divided court and cause remanded to the said District Court.
(Mr. Justice Day took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.)