Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc., et al.; United States v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc., et al.; American Automobile Association v. United States; United States, Trustee, v. Oregon; Horton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.; Gori v. United States; Estate of Cunha v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Hazelton, Administrator, v. City of San Diego et al.; Denny et al. v. Bush et al.; Holekamp et al. v. Holekamp Lumber Co. et al.; Licavoli v. United States; Millet et al. v. United States; Rogers et al. v. United States; Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Cliett v. Hammonds et al.; Air Line Pilots Association, International, et al. v. Quesada, Administrator, Federal Aviation Agency, 1961 — 368 U.S. 870 · caselaw · US