Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Royal Indemnity Co. et al. v. Cardillo, Deputy Commissioner, et al., 1937 — 302 U.S. 736 · caselaw · US
General
Royal Indemnity Co. et al. v. Cardillo, Deputy Commissioner, et al.
302 U.S. 736·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 411.
Royal Indemnity Co. et al. v. Cardillo, Deputy Commissioner, et al.
October 25, 1937.
Mr. Frank H. Myers for petitioners. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Whitaker, and Mr. Henry A. Julicher for respondent Cardillo. Mr. James E. McCabe for respondent Rennie.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.