Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John S. Barry, Respondent, v. J. Frank Calder et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1888 — 111 N.Y. 684 · caselaw · US
General
John S. Barry, Respondent, v. J. Frank Calder et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
111 N.Y. 684·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John S. Barry, Respondent, v. J. Frank Calder et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued November 27, 1888,
decided December 11, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 18, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside an order of arrest.
•G. B. Wellington for appellants.
G. <S. MeGhesney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.