Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona v. California et al., 1955 — 350 U.S. 812 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Arizona v. California et al.
350 U.S. 812·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10,
Original.
Arizona v. California et al.
[MAJORITY]
The report of the Special Master is received and it is ordered that exceptions thereto, if any, by the California defendants be filed on or before Friday, October 14th, next. It is ordered that Simon H. Rif kind, of New York City, be and he hereby is appointed Special Master in this case in the place of George I. Haight, deceased. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these questions.