Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Froehlich, Appellant, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 615 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Froehlich, Appellant
185 N.Y. 615·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Froehlich, Appellant.
People v. Froehlich, 110 App. Div. 878, affirmed.
(Argued June 12, 1906;
decided June 21, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered, December 8, 1905, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the'defendant of the crime of perjury.
Lewis Stuyvesant Ghanler and Lorlys Elton Rogers for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Robert O. Taylor and Robert 8. Johnstone of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.