Contracts · MBE-tested
Hurin M. Clements, Appellant, v. B. Sherwood-Dunn, Respondent, Impleaded with Another
187 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hurin M. Clements, Appellant, v. B. Sherwood-Dunn, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.
Clements v. 8herwood-Dunn, 108 App. Div. 327, affirmed.
(Argued December 17, 1906;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from, an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 15, 1905, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision' of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial in an action to enforce specific performance of an alleged oral contract for services.
Thomas D. Adams and A. C. Palmer for appellant.
Hubert E. Rogers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant, on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.