Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Hey et al., Respondents, v. Gerhard Collman, Appellant, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
General
John Hey et al., Respondents, v. Gerhard Collman, Appellant
180 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Hey et al., Respondents, v. Gerhard Collman, Appellant.
Hey v. Gollman, 78 App. Div. 584, affirmed.
(Submitted February 1, 1905;
decided February 21, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 21, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
John J. Beattie for appellant.
M. N. Kane for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen,. Oh. J., Gbay, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.