Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Routenberg, Appellant, v. Morris Schweitzer, Respondent, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 566 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Routenberg, Appellant, v. Morris Schweitzer, Respondent
164 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Routenberg, Appellant, v. Morris Schweitzer, Respondent.
Reported below, 50 App. Div. 218.
(Submitted October 1, 1900;
decided October 9, 1900.)
Motion to prefer an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made April 2, 1900, affirming an order of the Appellate Term of that court reversing a decision of the Municipal Court of the city of New York.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal is from an order declaring an act of the legislature unconstitutional,
Ashley, Emley <& liubino for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted.