Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Frederick Noll, as General Guardian of Emelie Weimann et al., Respondents; John G. Landmann et al., Appellants, 1897 — 154 N.Y. 765 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Frederick Noll, as General Guardian of Emelie Weimann et al., Respondents; John G. Landmann et al., Appellants
154 N.Y. 765·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Frederick Noll, as General Guardian of Emelie Weimann et al., Respondents; John G. Landmann et al., Appellants.
Matter of Noll, 10 App. Div. 356, affirmed.
(Argued November 29, 1897;
decided December 14, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of' the-Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 19, 1896, upon an order which affirmed a decree of the surrogate of Kings county judicially settling the account of a general guardian.
Joseph Potter, George F. Martens and Thomas J. Farrell for appellants.
Peter W. Ostrcmder and James D. Bell for respondents..
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.