Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Julius Jacobs et al., Appellants, v. The Howard Insurance Company of New York, Respondent, 1896 — 151 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
Julius Jacobs et al., Appellants, v. The Howard Insurance Company of New York, Respondent
151 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Jacobs et al., Appellants, v. The Howard Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.
(Argued October 27, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered January 15, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee, and also affirmed an order of Special Term entered January 29, 1892, granting an extra allowance.
Thomas P. Wickes for appellants.
T. Henry Dewey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.