Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Solomon KOURI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee; George SHOULHOUP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1930 — 41 F.2d 1003 · caselaw · US
General
Solomon KOURI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee; George SHOULHOUP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
41 F.2d 1003·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Solomon KOURI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. George SHOULHOUP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos, 2970, 3053.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
July 9, 1930.
Jó. N. Konna, of Charleston, W. Va., for appellants.
James Damron, U. S. Atty., of Huntington, W. Va..
Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and GRONER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In both of these appeals the judgment of the court below is reversed and a new trial is granted on the authority of Withrow v. U. S. (C. C. A. 4th) 1 F.(2d) 858, and Graham v. U. S. (C. C. A. 4th) 12 F.(2d) 717.
Reversed.