Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Henry McAleenan, as Executor of Margaret Lavery, Deceased, Respondent. Lawrence H. Quinn et al., Appellants; Augustine R. McMahon, as Special Guardian, et al., Respondents, 1901 — 165 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Henry McAleenan, as Executor of Margaret Lavery, Deceased, Respondent. Lawrence H. Quinn et al., Appellants; Augustine R. McMahon, as Special Guardian, et al., Respondents
165 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Henry McAleenan, as Executor of Margaret Lavery, Deceased, Respondent. Lawrence H. Quinn et al., Appellants; Augustine R. McMahon, as Special Guardian, et al., Respondents.
Matter of McAleenan, 53 App. Div. 193, affirmed.
(Argued January 8, 1901;
decided January 22, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made October 17, 1900, reversing a decree of the New York county Surrogate’s Court settling the account of Henry McAleenan, as executor of the last will and testament of Margaret Lavery, deceased.
Nelson S. Spencer, Robert Weil, M. E. Kelley and James F. Fogarty for appellants.
Augustine R. McMahon, Ashley Trimble Cole and William Arrowsmith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with one bill of costs against the appellant; no opinion.
Concur; Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.