Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES, 1963 — 372 U.S. 527 · caselaw · US
General
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES
372 U.S. 527·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES.
No. 425, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Robert S. Erdahl and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. On writ of certiorari the judgment is vacated and, in accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit with directions to allow the appeal in forma pauperis. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438.