Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Warren Rosevelt, Respondent, v. Alexander McGraw, Appellant, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 573 · caselaw · US
General
Warren Rosevelt, Respondent, v. Alexander McGraw, Appellant
133 N.Y. 573·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Warren Rosevelt, Respondent, v. Alexander McGraw, Appellant.
(Argued April 11, 1892;
decided April 26, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Eew York, made October 10,1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a reference and appointing a referee.
John Brooks Lea/oitt for appellant.
William G. Bussey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.