Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph P. MURR, et al., petitioners, v. WISCONSIN, et al., 2016 — 137 S. Ct. 266 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph P. MURR, et al., petitioners, v. WISCONSIN, et al.
137 S. Ct. 266196 L. Ed. 2d 15·Supreme Court of the United States·2016
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph P. MURR, et al., petitioners,
v.
WISCONSIN, et al.
No. 15-214.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 3, 2016.
Motion of respondents Wisconsin and St. Croix County for divided argument are granted. Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, and for divided argument granted and the time is divided as follows: 35 minutes for petitioners, 15 minutes for respondent Wisconsin, 10 minutes for respondent St. Croix County, and 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General.