Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isabella L. Lake, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hiram Lake, Deceased, Respondent, v. George W. Anderson, Appellant, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 524 · caselaw · US
General
Isabella L. Lake, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hiram Lake, Deceased, Respondent, v. George W. Anderson, Appellant
174 N.Y. 524·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isabella L. Lake, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hiram Lake, Deceased, Respondent, v. George W. Anderson, Appellant.
Lake v. Anderson, 76 App. Div. 189, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 16, 1903;
decided March 24, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 24, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon, the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the affirmance was unanimous and that there was no legal question in the case of sufficient doubt to require its review by the Court of Appeals.
A. D. TVales for motion.
J. C. TaWmadge opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs in this court and ten dollars costs of motion.