Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., v. NORTH AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., et al., 1958 — 355 U.S. 465 · caselaw · US
General
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., v. NORTH AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., et al.
355 U.S. 4652 L. Ed. 2d 419·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., v. NORTH AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., et al.
No. 55.
Argued January 30, 1958.
Decided February 3, 1958.
Howard C. Westwood argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
O.D. Ozment argued the cause for the Civil Aeronautics Board, respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Franklin M. Stone and Robert L. Toomey.
No appearance fpr North American Airlines, Inc., respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed insofar as it set aside the Board’s order. American Airlines, Inc., v. North American Airlines, Inc., 351 U. S. 79.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.