Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brighton Beach Racing Association, Appellant, v. The Home Insurance Company, Respondent, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 526 · caselaw · US
General
Brighton Beach Racing Association, Appellant, v. The Home Insurance Company, Respondent
189 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Brighton Beach Racing Association, Appellant, v. The Home Insurance Company, Respondent.
Brighton Beach Baaing Assn. v. Home Ins. Go., 113 App. Div. 738, affirmed.
(Argued June 6, 1907;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 22, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision'of the court on trial without a jury in an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance.
Frank Paine Reilly and Charles H. Ilyde for appellant.
George Richards and Alfred B. Nathan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.