Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Uphaus v. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire, 1960 — 364 U.S. 802 · caselaw · US
General
Uphaus v. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire
364 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion the application should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
September 1, 1960.
No. 336,
October Term, 1960.
Uphaus v. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire.
Louis Lusky, Marvin H. Morse, Grenville Clark, Dudley W. Orr, Royal W. France, Hugh H. Bownes and Leonard B. Boudin for appellant. Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire, for appellee.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire. The application for bail presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, is denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion the application should be granted.