Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mutual Loan Association, Respondent, v. Joseph S. Lesser et al., Appellants; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
General
Mutual Loan Association, Respondent, v. Joseph S. Lesser et al., Appellants; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants
183 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mutual Loan Association, Respondent, v. Joseph S. Lesser et al., Appellants. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants.
(Argued December 5, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Mutual Loan Association v. Lesser, 94 App. Div. 619, affirmed.
Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in 'the first judicial department, entered May 16, 1904, affirming judgments in favor of plaintiff entered upon verdicts and orders denying motions for new trials.
Edward W. S. Johnston, Arthur Furber and Abraham A. Joseph for appellants.
Franklin Pierce for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Vann and Werneb, JJ,