General
ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN
364 U.S. 519·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN.
No. 308,
Misc.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Petitioner pro se.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Michigan, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.