General
Otto Young, an Infant, by Mathilde Young, his Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Eugene Dietzgen Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Another
176 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Otto Young, an Infant, by Mathilde Young, his Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Eugene Dietzgen Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.
Young v. Eugene Dietzgen Do., 72 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Argued October 27, 1903;
decided November 10, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered J une 7, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
John J. Schwarts and David Burr Luckey for appellant.
W. W. MacFarland for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.