Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nebraska Press Assn. et al. v. Stuart, Judge, 1975 — 423 U.S. 1011 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Nebraska Press Assn. et al. v. Stuart, Judge
423 U.S. 1011·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-513.
Nebraska Press Assn. et al. v. Stuart, Judge.
[See No. A-426, supra.].
[MAJORITY]
Motion to treat previously filed papers as a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska granted; consideration of said petition for writ of certiorari is deferred until requested responses thereto have been received or until the close of business Tuesday, December 9, 1975. Consideration of application for stay of judgment of the Supreme Court of Nebraska, entered December 1, 1975, deferred pending further order of the Court.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the application.