Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mrs. Laura L. Bunch, Petitioner, v. J. S. Maloney, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the T. H. Bunch Commission Company, Bankrupt, 1918 — 246 U.S. 658 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Mrs. Laura L. Bunch, Petitioner, v. J. S. Maloney, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the T. H. Bunch Commission Company, Bankrupt
246 U.S. 658·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 256.
Mrs. Laura L. Bunch, Petitioner, v. J. S. Maloney, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the T. H. Bunch Commission Company, Bankrupt.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals" for the Eighth Circuit.
Argued April 23, 1918.
Decided April 29, 1918.
Mr. W. E. Hemingway, Mr. G. B. Rose, Mr. J. F. Loughborough and Mr. V. M. Miles for petitioner.
Mr. R. S. Wimberly and Mr. J. M. Moore for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs, and case remanded to the District Court of the United States for .the Eastern District of Arkansas for further proceedings, upon the authority of Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 245 U. S. 513.