Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Miles E. Griffiths, Appellant, v. The New Jersey and New York Railroad Company, Respondent, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 595 · caselaw · US
General
Miles E. Griffiths, Appellant, v. The New Jersey and New York Railroad Company, Respondent
149 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Miles E. Griffiths, Appellant, v. The New Jersey and New York Railroad Company, Respondent.
Griffiths v. N. J. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 8 Misc. Rep. 3, affirmed.
(Argued April 27, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made April 11, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint upon the trial, and also affirmed an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the minutes.
Henry H. Whitman for appellant.
Robert Thorne and De Forest Brothers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.