Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Louisiana et al.
393 U.S. 811·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 14, 1968.
No. 9,
Orig.
United States v. Louisiana et al.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, John L. Madden, Assistant Attorney General, and Victor A. Sachse, Paul M. Hebert, Thomas W. Leigh, W. Scott Wilkinson, J. B. Miller, Oliver P. Stockwell, J. J. Davidson, and Frederick W. Ellis, Special Assistant Attorneys General, on the motion.
[For earlier order herein, see 391 U. S. 910.]
[MAJORITY]
Case set for argument on supplemental decrees proposed by the United States and the State of Texas. Motion of the State of Louisiana for additional time for oral argument on supplemental decree applicable to it denied.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.