Corporations

James H. Flynn, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent; Canice Cassin, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent

174 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

James H. Flynn, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent. Canice Cassin, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent. Flynn v. City of New York, > 6g App. Div. 433¡ afflrmed) Cassin v. Gity of New T ork, ) (Argued March 4, 1903; decided March 17, 1903.) Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 17, 1902, modifying and affirming as modified judgments in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee. Thomas F. Magner for appellants. George L. Rimes, Corporation Counsel (James McKeen of counsel), for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent': Gray, J.