General
Simpson v. Teets, Warden
353 U.S. 926·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 594,
Misc.
Simpson v. Teets, Warden.
A. J. Zirpoli for petitioner. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to grant a hearing on the allegations of the petition for writ of habeas corpus unless the court finds that petitioner’s state remedies have not been exhausted.