Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schlanger v. Seamans, Secretary of the Air Force, et al., 1971 — 401 U.S. 927 · caselaw · US
General
Schlanger v. Seamans, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.
401 U.S. 927·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that the application should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 24, 1971
No. 5481.
Schlanger v. Seamans, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 400 U. S. 865.] Application for injunctive relief presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that the application should be granted.