Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Stoutenburgh, as Trustee under the Will of Samuel Browning, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Charles G. Davison et al., Respondents. Joseph H. Mathews, Party in Interest, Appellant, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
John H. Stoutenburgh, as Trustee under the Will of Samuel Browning, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Charles G. Davison et al., Respondents. Joseph H. Mathews, Party in Interest, Appellant
166 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Stoutenburgh, as Trustee under the Will of Samuel Browning, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Charles G. Davison et al., Respondents. Joseph H. Mathews, Party in Interest, Appellant.
Stoutenburgh v. Davison, 59 App. Div. 621, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted April 15, 1901;
decided April 23, 1901.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made March 22,1901, affirming orders of Special Term, denying motions of Joseph H. Mathews to be made a party plaintiff in this action and to set aside an order made in the, above-entitled proceedings.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Marsh & Wever for motion.
Fleming & Fleming opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with one bill of costs.