Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. v. INTERNATIONAL COMBUSTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al., 1934 — 68 F.2d 952 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. v. INTERNATIONAL COMBUSTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al.
68 F.2d 952·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. v. INTERNATIONAL COMBUSTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al.
No. 122.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 8, 1934.
Charles A. Roberts, of New York City, for appellant.
White & Case, of New York City (Otey McClellan, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees International Combustion Engineering Corporation, and E. W. Stetson et al., Reorganization Committee.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Receivers were appointed for the appellee International Combustion Engineering Corporation. The appellant had granted to him patents on inventions which were held by the receivers and sought by this petition to intervene to protect his interest in such patents under contracts entered into between the petitioner and the corporation. The District Court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, denied the petition. The appeal is from the order entered thereon. A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal. The motion will be granted for the order is not appealable. See City of N. Y. v. Consolidated Gas Co., 253 U. S. 219, 40 S. Ct. 511, 64 L. Ed. 870; City of N. Y. v. N. Y. Tel. Co., 261 U. S. 312, 43 S. Ct. 372, 67 L. Ed. 673; Palmer v. Bankers’ Trust Co., 12 F.(2d) 747 (C. C. A. 8).
-Appeal dismissed.