Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas BULGER, Libelant Appellee, v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, Respondent Appellee, and Barge MARY ETHEL, etc., Timothy J. Donovan, Claimant Appellee, and Steam TUG MAHANOY, etc., Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant; Home Insurance Company, Libelant Appellee, v. Barge Mary Ethel, etc., Timothy Donovan, Claimant Appellee, and Steam Tug Mahanoy, Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant, and National Lead Company, Respondent Impleaded, Appellee, and Barge Thomas Bulger, etc., Thomas Bulger, Claimant Impleaded, Appellee, 1925 — 5 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas BULGER, Libelant Appellee, v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, Respondent Appellee, and Barge MARY ETHEL, etc., Timothy J. Donovan, Claimant Appellee, and Steam TUG MAHANOY, etc., Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant; Home Insurance Company, Libelant Appellee, v. Barge Mary Ethel, etc., Timothy Donovan, Claimant Appellee, and Steam Tug Mahanoy, Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant, and National Lead Company, Respondent Impleaded, Appellee, and Barge Thomas Bulger, etc., Thomas Bulger, Claimant Impleaded, Appellee
5 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas BULGER, Libelant Appellee, v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, Respondent Appellee, and Barge MARY ETHEL, etc., Timothy J. Donovan, Claimant Appellee, and Steam TUG MAHANOY, etc., Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant. Home Insurance Company, Libelant Appellee, v. Barge Mary Ethel, etc., Timothy Donovan, Claimant Appellee, and Steam Tug Mahanoy, Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant, and National Lead Company, Respondent Impleaded, Appellee, and Barge Thomas Bulger, etc., Thomas Bulger, Claimant Impleaded, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 16, 1925.)
Nos. 181, 182.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (Leonard J. Matteson and C. W. Hagen, both of New York City of counsel), for appellant.
Macklin, Brown & Van Wyck, of New York City, for appellees Bulger and Home Ins. Co. William J. Mahar, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel),
Alexander & Green, of New York City (Henry E. Mattison and H. S. Ogden, both of New York City, of counsel), for appel-lee National Lead Co.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (290 F. 458) affirmed.