Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bellaskus v. Crossman, Officer in Charge, U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 1948 — 335 U.S. 840 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bellaskus v. Crossman, Officer in Charge, U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
335 U.S. 840·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 18, 1948.
No. 10.
Bellaskus v. Crossman, Officer in Charge, U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service.
Argued October 13, 1948.
Decided October 18, 1948.
Petitioner submitted on brief pro se.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General and consideration of the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its order discharging the rule to show cause and dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent.
With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Robert S. Erdahl.