Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 1947 — 332 U.S. 762 · caselaw · US
General
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
332 U.S. 762·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 147.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
Ira Lloyd Letts, D. H. Guitón, John S. L. Yost, Edward H. Lange, John W. Scott and Harry S. Littman for petitioner.
Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert L. Stern, Charles E. McGee and Louis W. McKernan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.