Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harsh v. Illinois Terminal Railroad Co., 1955 — 348 U.S. 940 · caselaw · US
General
Harsh v. Illinois Terminal Railroad Co.
348 U.S. 94099 L. Ed. 2d 736·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 125.
Harsh v. Illinois Terminal Railroad Co.
Argued February 8, 1955.
Decided February 14, 1955.
Morris B. Chapman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Fred P. Schuman and Harold G. Talley argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief were George D. Burroughs and Gordon Burroughs.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 809, to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
Per Curiam:
Judgment reversed. Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U. S. 645.