Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ENG YEW WING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee; CHAN YICK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1931 — 53 F.2d 1080 · caselaw · US
General
ENG YEW WING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee; CHAN YICK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
53 F.2d 1080·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ENG YEW WING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. CHAN YICK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 6679, 6671.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 23, 1931.
Herbert C. Bryson, of Walla Walla, Wash., and Francis A. Garrecht, of Spokane, Wash., for appellants.
Roy C. Fox, U. S. Atty., and E. J. Farley, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Spokane, Wash.
Before SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge, and NETERER and ST. SURE, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, ordered appeal in each of the above causes dismissed; mandates forthwith.