Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Minnie H. Congdon, as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur E. Congdon, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 545 · caselaw · US
General
Minnie H. Congdon, as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur E. Congdon, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
182 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Minnie H. Congdon, as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur E. Congdon, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 15, 1905;
decided October 3, 1905.)
Congdon v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 93 App. Div. 605, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 3,1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
W. S. Jenney for appellant.
P. C. J. De Angelis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costsno opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Vann, J.