General

Ann Kenney, Respondent, v. The City of Cohoes, Appellant

100 N.Y. 623·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Ann Kenney, Respondent, v. The City of Cohoes, Appellant. (Argued October 15, 1885; decided October 30, 1885.) The question in this case was simply as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. The court say: “ There were questions for the determination of the jury, and their verdict having been approved by the trial judge and the General Term we have no jurisdiction to interfere therewith. (Goodfellow v. Mayor, etc., ; Bullock v. Mayor, etc., 99 N. Y. 654.” E. Countryman for appellant. R. A. Parmenter for respondent. Ante, p. 15. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam] Per Curiam mem. for affirmance. All concur. Judgment affirmed.