Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Evans, trading as Otis Evans Truck Line, v. United States et al., 1946 — 329 U.S. 668 · caselaw · US
General
Evans, trading as Otis Evans Truck Line, v. United States et al.
329 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 296.
Evans, trading as Otis Evans Truck Line, v. United States et al.
October 14, 1946.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Alton Railroad Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 15, 25; United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475, 484, 490; Mis sissippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U. S. 282, 286-7.
Rutledge C. Clement for appellant.
Solicitor General McGrath and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.