Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Baumet et al. v. United States et al., 1952 — 343 U.S. 925 · caselaw · US
General
Baumet et al. v. United States et al.
343 U.S. 925·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 203,
Misc.
Baumet et al. v. United States et al.
Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Perlman filed a memorandum for the United States, respondent, stating that the Government does not oppose the granting of a writ of certiorari in this case. George G. Gallantz for Peters, Executrix, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.