Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Milton Dewey SMITH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. The Honorable H. F. SMITH et al., Defendants-Appellees, 1975 — 519 F.2d 1376 · caselaw · US
General
Milton Dewey SMITH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. The Honorable H. F. SMITH et al., Defendants-Appellees
519 F.2d 1376·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Milton Dewey SMITH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. The Honorable H. F. SMITH et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 73-3345.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 13, 1975.
Donald R. Wharton (argued), Klamath Falls, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants.
William P. Brandsness (argued), Kla-math Falls, Or., for defendants-appellees.
Before MOORE, DUNIWAY and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Leonard P. Moore, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
The order appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of District Judge Burns, D.C.Or., 1973, 396 F.Supp. 367.