Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 922 · caselaw · US
General
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al.
362 U.S. 922·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 558,
Misc.
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al.
Francis T. Anderson for petitioners.
Louis Nizer and Walter S. Beck for National Screen Service Corp., W. Bradley Ward and Edward W. Mullinix for Columbia Pictures Corp. et al., Abraham L. Freedman and Louis J. Goffman for Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.